191)This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
Dharma
juvel
Blackace
loverman
doppich
AMDeitzler
ind06
Aidenag
birddog54
Eagle Eye
austinc
Wil
Neophile
About Propeller | Frequently Asked Questions | Help
© 2003-2008 Propeller. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
It's very exciting that scientists are beginning to speak out about this disinformation campaign.
I completely agree, Deborah. It seems like there are two groups of people at the moment: those who understand the science and the real threat to our planet, and those who believe the petroleum industry's propaganda.
As someone who truly loves this planet we live on, I sincerely hope that more of the people who have been fooled by the propaganda can be enlightened, so that we can all work together as a species to ensure our planet's survival.
(I love Earth & Sky, too. Thanks for all the work you do to make it happen.)
The only disinformation campaign is being run by corporate interests with the help of the anti-environmental fasctists in the U.S. government.
From your incredible post it appears that you have been studying Republican spin. Implying that the media refusing to air disinformation directly leads to totalitarianism is a twit's attempt at being Rovian because it was the media's compliance to the administration's lies and refusal to discuss Bush's illegal behavior that leads to totalitarianism.
Understand this, global warming and its implications are debated each and every day within the scientific community. There is no conspiracy to keep opposing views from being published be cause they are published. That you do not find them means simply that either you don't understand the debate or you are too ideological to actually review the articles.
>Understand this, global warming and its implications are debated each and every day within the scientific community. There is no conspiracy to keep opposing views from being published be cause they are published.
Debate and peer-reviewed science?
Pretty much the opposite of everything the Bush admin did while the do-nothing rubber stamp Republicans controlled congress.
You got that right. The anti-environmentalists on this site like capecoralM are absolutely ideological. For example, capecoralM posted a link (above) to a report written by John Kyl on the Republican Policy Committee as proof that solar activity is a major contributor to global warming. Not an article by a real scientist, but by a conservative know-nothing ideologue.
This is how the Republican develop policy, ignore inconvenient truths for ideological reasons.
dixie chicks. dan rather. bill maher.
Fools will remain...it's their nature.