This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Of course they will. But it will be cheerful to note that the people responding to their arguments can now claim that the study was retracted solely because the author thought it was pure BS that it was used as a weapon against science.
Sadly, it's pretty much guaranteed we'll still be seeing creationists trying to cite this paper 10 years from now.
Of course they will. But it will be cheerful to note that the people responding to their arguments can now claim that the study was retracted solely because the author thought it was pure BS that it was used as a weapon against science.